Accountability and Adaptability are not Trade-Offs

by

Edward Addai

12 April 2026

You have just finalized a comprehensive annual workplan for child mortality reduction. Every output is meticulously defined, every indicator precisely calibrated. Three months in, a drought shifts community priorities overnight. Your donor requires a no-cost extension to change activities. Your headquarters demands revised logframes. Meanwhile, community health volunteers are reallocating supplies on their own because waiting for approval means preventable deaths.

Do you enforce compliance and protect accountability? Or adapt to save lives but risk losing control? This is the quiet crisis no performance report captures.

Why “Both” Is the Only Answer

We have been told that accountability demands rigid adherence to plans, while responsiveness requires abandoning discipline altogether. Both are false. Results-Based Management (RBM) has delivered welcome focus on outcomes, yet scholars have found that its rigidity negatively affects the adaptability of development agencies (Bajwa & Kitchlew, 2019). Conversely, unfettered flexibility without structure leads to mission drift and wasted resources.

Disciplined flexibility is the dynamic interplay between commitment to purpose and responsiveness in practice. It means holding tightly to your core mission while loosening your grip on predetermined methods. As one framework describes it, effective adaptive management requires managers who create team cultures that reward curiosity, admit failure openly, and debate strategy transparently (Allana & Sparkman, 2015).

What It Looks Like

In eastern Kenya, a maternal and child health project found that communities strategically engaged with global health discourses to reshape programme activities around local needs. This is what researchers termed “flexible sustainabilities” (du Plessis, 2018). The core mission of reducing maternal mortality remained fixed; the methods evolved through genuine community partnership.

Across Ethiopia, Ghana and Liberia, Accelerated Learning Programmes adapted school calendars to local harvest cycles, used mother-tongue instruction rather than colonial languages, and empowered teachers to innovate within structured curricula. Completion rates exceeded 95 percent, and transition to formal schooling rose from 84 to 95 percent (UNESCO, 2025).

In Kenya, the Family Needs Based Method gives social workers a modest budget of approximately EUR 300 per family but the professional discretion to determine how best to prevent family separation (Partos, 2024). Standardised safeguards provide accountability; frontline judgement enables responsiveness.

What This Teaches Us About Managing for Results

These examples reveal three essential lessons. First, accountability and adaptability are not trade-offs; they are mutually reinforcing when measurement focuses on outcomes, not activities. Second, disciplined flexibility requires investing in frontline professional judgement, not merely compliance systems. Third, donors must build flexibility into contracts and approval processes (Allana & Sparkman, 2015).

Four Actions Every Social Sector Manager Must Take Now

Disciplined flexibility is not a mindset; it is a practice. To lead it, you must take four concrete actions.

First, define what cannot change. Your non-negotiables are your mission, ethical standards, and core safeguards for vulnerable populations. Everything else, the methods, timelines, activity designs, must be open to adaptation. In the Kenyan child protection example, the non-negotiable is preventing family separation; the EUR 300 is flexible.

Second, allow flexibility in how results are achieved. Shift your management from policing inputs to enabling outcomes. In the drought scenario, this means approving revised activity plans within days, not months, as long as maternal mortality targets remain unchanged.

Third, build strong feedback loops. Real-time data from frontline workers and community members must reach decision-makers weekly, not quarterly. The education programmes succeeded because teachers’ observations on local harvest cycles fed directly into calendar adjustments.

Fourth, invest in trust across the system. Trust with communities, with frontline staff, and with donors. Without trust, flexibility becomes chaos; with it, discipline becomes enabling. Start by replacing compliance checklists with learning conversations in your next team meeting.

The question is no longer whether you can afford flexibility. It is whether you can afford to keep mistaking rigidity for rigour.

References

Allana, A. and Sparkman, T. (2015) ‘Navigating complexity: adaptive management and organizational learning in a development project in Northern Uganda’, Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 11(1), pp. 4-20.

Bajwa, S.U. and Kitchlew, N. (2019) ‘Evaluating Result Based Management (RBM) and the need for complexity aware management approach for international development agencies’, Journal of Management and Research, 6(1), pp. 1-25.

du Plessis, E. (2018) Flexible sustainabilities: continuity and change in an MNCH project in Eastern Kenya. PhD thesis. University of Manitoba.

Partos (2024) ‘Flexible family help changes lives’, Partos Impact Stories, 22 May.

UNESCO (2025) Reconceptualizing the Learning Crisis in Africa: Multi-dimensional pedagogies of accelerated learning programmes. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Search for Leverage Points: Why Complexity Demands Smarter Effort in the Social Sector

by Edward Addai edwardaddai64@gmail.com   Something May Be Wrong With How We Work Imagine a district health officer in northern Ghana. Each year, she receives a budget, trains community health workers, runs immunisation campaigns, distributes bed nets and reports results to her superiors. Vaccination coverage climbs modestly. Child mortality falls a little. But stunting rates remain stubbornly high. Girls still drop out of school to care for sick siblings. Teenage pregnancies continue to undermine decades of investment. Something may be wrong, and it is not her effort; it is where the effort is being directed. Now consider a child protection coordinator in rural Bangladesh. Every six months, she reviews her case files. The numbers of children referred to services have improved. Her case workers are certified and diligent. Yet the same families cycle through the system repeatedly, and the underlying conditions of poverty, patriarchal norms, seasonal hunger remain untouch...
Read more

When Good Intentions Fail: What the Cobra Effect Reveals About Managing for Results

by Edward Addai Have you ever launched a well-intentioned initiative only to watch it make things worse? Why do our most carefully designed interventions so often produce the opposite of what we intended? And what can a story about colonial-era snake hunters teach us about the fundamental challenges of managing for results in the social sector?   The Story That Haunts Every Manager Picture Delhi, 1902. The British colonial government, facing a crisis of venomous cobras in the city, implements what seems like an elegant solution: a cash reward for every dead cobra. Initially, the policy works brilliantly. Dead snakes pile up and grateful administrators congratulate themselves on their cleverness (Linkner, 2015). But then something curious happens. The cobra population doesn't decline, and yet bounty claims skyrocket. Investigators discover the truth: enterprising locals have begun breeding cobras in their homes, killing them, and collecting the rewards. Outraged, authoriti...
Read more

When Time and Effort Expand but Results Do Not: What Parkinson’s Law Reveals About Managing for Results

by Edward Addai Why do well-intentioned programmes sometimes consume more time, more meetings, and more reports, yet produce no greater impact for the communities they serve? This paradox was first articulated by Cyril Northcote Parkinson in 1955. Observing the growth of bureaucracies in the British civil service, he formulated a simple but powerful insight. Work expands to fill the time available for its completion (Parkinson, 1955). What began as an ironic observation has since become a foundational lesson for leaders concerned with results. In complex social systems where needs are urgent and resources scarce, the law reveals a quiet danger. Without deliberate discipline, time, staff, and institutional processes expand even when the task itself does not. Parkinson’s Law highlights a structural tendency within organizations. When time horizons are generous and accountability diffuse, activities multiply. Meetings generate more meetings. Reporting structures expand. Coordinatio...
Read more